Reversing an unauthorized denial
Challenging a denial that exceeds the committee's authority under the declaration, or that rests on a policy the declaration does not support.
Florida HOA and condo attorneys
An architectural committee can only exercise the authority the declaration gives it, and it must apply its standards even-handedly. A denial that goes beyond that can be challenged.
Architectural review disputes
Approval of fences, roofs, paint, additions and other changes is a power the declaration grants, and Florida law limits how it is used in an HOA.
Many owners assume an architectural committee can say no to anything. Chapter 720 does not read that way. An association and its committee may review and approve plans for structures only to the extent the declaration, or published guidelines it authorizes, specifically states or reasonably infers that authority, and the standards must be applied equitably across owners.
So the questions are concrete. Does the declaration give the committee power over this kind of change? Did it write down which rule the request violates? Did it treat your neighbor's identical request differently? Or did it simply sit on your application and never answer? Each points to a different kind of claim.
After a denial or silence
Architectural disputes are proven by what you submitted and what came back. Do not build first and argue later, because that changes the dispute.
Save the form, plans, photos, material samples, and proof of when and how you submitted them. If you never received a response, note the date and every follow-up.
If the answer was verbal, ask the association to state in writing which rule your request violates. The statute requires written notice stating the rule relied on when an association denies an improvement request.
Document similar fences, roofs, colors or additions already approved or standing in the community, with addresses and dates. Uneven treatment is evidence.
Proceeding without approval can turn a review dispute into a violation notice. Bring us the file first so the sequence is protected.
What an architectural dispute can address
The outcome is usually the approval itself. In some cases the statute also allows damages.
The specific facts decide which of these applies.
Challenging a denial that exceeds the committee's authority under the declaration, or that rests on a policy the declaration does not support.
Pushing a committee that ignored or stalled your application to follow its own procedure and answer in writing.
Where an association unreasonably, knowingly and willfully infringes an owner's declared rights, Section 720.3035 provides for damages, costs and attorney fees.
What Chapter 720 says about architectural control
Section 720.3035, Florida Statutes, governs architectural control covenants and the rights of parcel owners who want to improve their property.
It bars enforcement of covenants that limit interior spaces not visible from the frontage, adjacent parcels, common areas or golf courses. Where the declaration offers options for materials, size, design or location, the association cannot restrict an owner from choosing among them. It also prevents enforcement of a policy inconsistent with the declaration, whether or not it is applied uniformly, and it requires hurricane protection to be approved when it conforms to the board's adopted specifications.
Section 720.3035
These questions separate a lawful decision from an overreach.
How we work
An architectural dispute is settled by the grant of authority, the reason given, and how others were treated. We build those three comparisons before making any demand.
Talk with our teamA simpler way forward
You do not need to know which subsection applies. Send what you submitted and what you got back.
The improvement, when you applied, and what the association said or failed to say.
We tell you whether the committee appears to have acted within its authority, and whether the denial looks defensible.
If we take the matter, we send the demand, respond to any related violation notice, and pursue mediation if required.
Architectural dispute questions
The declaration's architectural provision decides how these apply to your request.
Ask us about your situation ↗No. Under Section 720.3035, Florida Statutes, an association and its architectural committee may review and approve plans only to the extent that authority is specifically stated or reasonably inferred in the declaration or its authorized guidelines, and they must apply the standards equitably across owners.
The statute provides that when an association denies a request to make an improvement, it must give written notice stating with specificity the rule or covenant relied on and the part of the proposal that does not conform. That makes the reason stated in the letter central to any challenge, and a denial with no rule identified is worth reviewing.
Not to the extent the statute prohibits. Section 720.3035 bars enforcement of covenants limiting interior spaces not visible from the frontage, adjacent parcels, common areas or golf courses. An association also may not require review and approval of plans for a central air-conditioning or heating system that is not visible from the frontage, an adjacent parcel, a common area or a golf course and is substantially similar to a system the association or its committee has approved or recommended.
The statute provides that an owner may recover damages, costs and attorney fees if the association unreasonably, knowingly and willfully infringes the owner's declared rights. That is a high standard, so the facts matter. In other actions under Section 720.305, the prevailing party generally recovers fees.
Generally yes for HOA disputes over use of or changes to a parcel. Section 720.311 calls for a written demand and mediation first, and a party who fails to participate in mediation may not recover attorney fees and costs in later litigation. Collection of fines and money owed is excluded.
Proof and further reading
Case resultWe won $59K for a condo owner after an upstairs plumbing leak, holding the HOA, insurer, and neighbor accountable through litigation.
Read the case →
Case resultJimenez Legal helped a Florida condominium owner recover hurricane damage coverage after their insurer and association fell short.
Read the case →
Case resultWe turned a $76K insurance payout into $265K for condo owners after a catastrophic plumbing leak destroyed their high-end unit.
Read the case →